Thursday, November 08, 2007

Firecrackers...

Today was Diwali (Ref. earlier post of the day for explanation). Every year, I fall sick on this day. No, it's not some strange and unknown curse like that of the Pharaohs that gets me, but a simple allergy. Every year, I get allergic to the smoke caused by firecrackers and fall sick. Last year, it was a throat infection. The year before last I was, thankfully, in Paris. And in the preceding years, I was variously sick with cold, sneezing, throat infection and even fever. This year, I suspect it will be wheezing. I can hardly breathe. The air is full of smoke. I wish I could do something about it. Before any of you begin to accuse me of double standards, I have never burst crackers, even as a kid, nor do I intend to in the near future. I refused to burst them, not because I was making a statement against pollution, but because I was terrified of the noise it made.

Anyway, my rants apart, the point is, is this really necessary? The last I heard, Diwali was also known as Deepavali: the festival of lights. I don't see too much light here in Chennai. Instead, I hear the kind of noise one would expect if he/she were stuck on Mount Road with everyone around them honking. One look at the price list of the local supermarket reveals rather a lot. One would have to spend nearly Rs. 2000 ($50) on firecrackers for a child. This, assuming the said kid likes to burst them and have a good time. And in India, Rs. 2000 is a lot of money. Is this really needed? Can't we teach our kids to spend that money better? Even a trip to a restaurant or new clothes would be worth it. It appears a criminal waste to buy firecrackers for $50 only to burn them up (literally) the next day. Be honest, would you burn a $50 bill for fun? I wouldn't.

Oh well, I am ranting again. My cousin tells me my questions attest the fact that I am old. She is 12. Maybe she is right. At the ripe old age of 25, I fail to appreciate the intricacies of cracker-bursting and look at it as a waste of money rather than necessary expenditure. Yes, she is right. I am growing old!

1 comment:

Nita writes said...

Amri,

I think Guruvayoor temple(and might I add, most hindu temples in Kerala) are against the salwar kameez because they're under a false impression that the attire has its origins from the Mughal era and that obviously has leanings towards... you guessed it; Islamic culture... which in turn by Hindu standards is... erm, "abachaaram". Any hindu connotations that can be drawn from the garment are the fact that the dupatta that's become an integral(but nowadays an optional) part of the complete package.

Its sad really; because logically speaking , the salwar worn properly covers more than even the best draped sari could. So why the big fuss you ask ? Frankly, I don't know, but I'd rather go wearing a skirt and a blouse than drape myself in a sari if I ever get to go to Kerala temples again.